Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
ITAT held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond 3 years is impermissible when tax evasion does not exceed Rs. 50,00,000. Relying on precedents from Delhi HC and Bombay HC, the tribunal quashed the reassessment notice u/s 148A(d) and 148, finding the proceedings invalid. The AO's best judgment assessment, which added unexplained investment and stamp duty value differences, was set aside. The assessee's appeal was allowed, rendering subsequent grounds academic, effectively nullifying the extended assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
