Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
CESTAT ruled on the Target Plus Scheme (TPS) eligibility for duty exemption on imported plastic granules used in packaging exported rice and spices. The Tribunal held that while the plastic granules were not directly in the same product group as rice and spices, they had a broad functional nexus in packaging. The Customs Department lacks independent authority to deny TPS benefits, which exclusively rests with DGFT. The Original Authority found no violations of TPS conditions, and the Revenue failed to provide substantive evidence challenging the assessee's eligibility. The appeal was consequently dismissed, affirming the Commissioner's decision to drop further proceedings and uphold the TPS license's validity.
CESTAT ruled on the Target Plus Scheme (TPS) eligibility for duty exemption on imported plastic granules used in packaging exported rice and spices. The Tribunal held that while the plastic granules were not directly in the same product group as rice and spices, they had a broad functional nexus in packaging. The Customs Department lacks independent authority to deny TPS benefits, which exclusively rests with DGFT. The Original Authority found no violations of TPS conditions, and the Revenue failed to provide substantive evidence challenging the assessee's eligibility. The appeal was consequently dismissed, affirming the Commissioner's decision to drop further proceedings and uphold the TPS license's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.