Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95832 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC analyzed the extinguishment of electricity consumption claims not included in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan (CIRP). The court held that debts not submitted or incorporated in the resolution plan before the effective date stand extinguished. The resolution plan's sanctity is paramount, and subsequent claims cannot be entertained. The court affirmed the first respondent's locus standi to challenge demand notices against group companies. The CIRP resolution plan remains valid and binding unless set aside by a competent authority. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the strict interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's provisions regarding debt resolution and claim settlement.
HC analyzed the extinguishment of electricity consumption claims not included in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan (CIRP). The court held that debts not submitted or incorporated in the resolution plan before the effective date stand extinguished. The resolution plan's sanctity is paramount, and subsequent claims cannot be entertained. The court affirmed the first respondent's locus standi to challenge demand notices against group companies. The CIRP resolution plan remains valid and binding unless set aside by a competent authority. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the strict interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's provisions regarding debt resolution and claim settlement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
