Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC analyzed the extinguishment of electricity consumption claims not included in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan (CIRP). The court held that debts not submitted or incorporated in the resolution plan before the effective date stand extinguished. The resolution plan's sanctity is paramount, and subsequent claims cannot be entertained. The court affirmed the first respondent's locus standi to challenge demand notices against group companies. The CIRP resolution plan remains valid and binding unless set aside by a competent authority. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the strict interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's provisions regarding debt resolution and claim settlement.
HC analyzed the extinguishment of electricity consumption claims not included in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan (CIRP). The court held that debts not submitted or incorporated in the resolution plan before the effective date stand extinguished. The resolution plan's sanctity is paramount, and subsequent claims cannot be entertained. The court affirmed the first respondent's locus standi to challenge demand notices against group companies. The CIRP resolution plan remains valid and binding unless set aside by a competent authority. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the strict interpretation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's provisions regarding debt resolution and claim settlement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
