Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed notices issued under FEMA during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), holding that IBC provisions override FEMA regulations. The court determined that the moratorium under Section 14 of IBC prohibits continuation of legal proceedings against corporate debtor, regardless of when original proceedings were initiated. Section 33(5) and judicial precedents further supported the ruling that IBC protections supersede FEMA provisions. While notices were invalidated, the court clarified that individual directors could still face potential legal action for pre-CIRP misconduct. The petition was ultimately allowed, effectively protecting the corporate debtor's assets during liquidation proceedings.
HC quashed notices issued under FEMA during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), holding that IBC provisions override FEMA regulations. The court determined that the moratorium under Section 14 of IBC prohibits continuation of legal proceedings against corporate debtor, regardless of when original proceedings were initiated. Section 33(5) and judicial precedents further supported the ruling that IBC protections supersede FEMA provisions. While notices were invalidated, the court clarified that individual directors could still face potential legal action for pre-CIRP misconduct. The petition was ultimately allowed, effectively protecting the corporate debtor's assets during liquidation proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
