Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed notices issued under FEMA during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), holding that IBC provisions override FEMA regulations. The court determined that the moratorium under Section 14 of IBC prohibits continuation of legal proceedings against corporate debtor, regardless of when original proceedings were initiated. Section 33(5) and judicial precedents further supported the ruling that IBC protections supersede FEMA provisions. While notices were invalidated, the court clarified that individual directors could still face potential legal action for pre-CIRP misconduct. The petition was ultimately allowed, effectively protecting the corporate debtor's assets during liquidation proceedings.
HC quashed notices issued under FEMA during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), holding that IBC provisions override FEMA regulations. The court determined that the moratorium under Section 14 of IBC prohibits continuation of legal proceedings against corporate debtor, regardless of when original proceedings were initiated. Section 33(5) and judicial precedents further supported the ruling that IBC protections supersede FEMA provisions. While notices were invalidated, the court clarified that individual directors could still face potential legal action for pre-CIRP misconduct. The petition was ultimately allowed, effectively protecting the corporate debtor's assets during liquidation proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.