Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a service tax recovery case involving procedural service of show cause notice (SCN) during COVID-19 pandemic. The tribunal determined that electronic service via email was valid, citing Supreme Court's guidance on alternative notice delivery methods. The court referenced Article 141 of the Constitution, affirming SC orders as binding precedent. Despite appellant's challenge regarding non-traditional SCN service, the tribunal found the electronic notice transmission legitimate, particularly given pandemic constraints. The appellant's substantive arguments were deemed without merit. Consequently, the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the original tax recovery, interest, and penalty assessment.
CESTAT adjudicated a service tax recovery case involving procedural service of show cause notice (SCN) during COVID-19 pandemic. The tribunal determined that electronic service via email was valid, citing Supreme Court's guidance on alternative notice delivery methods. The court referenced Article 141 of the Constitution, affirming SC orders as binding precedent. Despite appellant's challenge regarding non-traditional SCN service, the tribunal found the electronic notice transmission legitimate, particularly given pandemic constraints. The appellant's substantive arguments were deemed without merit. Consequently, the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the original tax recovery, interest, and penalty assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
