Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4641 to 4660 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that while the State's tax exemption policy amendment under GST regime was valid, the arbitrary non-consideration of petitioners' extension applications compared to other similarly situated industries violated Article 14. The court directed respondent authorities to reconsider petitioners' claims within 60 days using identical evaluation criteria applied to other units. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was not applicable given public policy considerations and legal regime changes. Petitioners' claims for full tax exemption were rejected, but they were granted an opportunity for fair administrative review of their extension applications.
HC held that while the State's tax exemption policy amendment under GST regime was valid, the arbitrary non-consideration of petitioners' extension applications compared to other similarly situated industries violated Article 14. The court directed respondent authorities to reconsider petitioners' claims within 60 days using identical evaluation criteria applied to other units. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was not applicable given public policy considerations and legal regime changes. Petitioners' claims for full tax exemption were rejected, but they were granted an opportunity for fair administrative review of their extension applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
