Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that statutory limitation for passing a Final Assessment Order under Section 144C cannot be dependent on user functionalities or internal processes. The limitation period commences from the earliest instance when DRP directions are visible to the assessing officer through the 360-degree view portal. The fact that no separate email was sent to the Assessing Officer does not impact the timeline, as the system provides real-time access to uploaded documents. Referencing precedents from Vodafone Idea Limited and Louis Dreyfus Company India Private Limited, the court decisively ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that limitation provisions must have a strict and unambiguous interpretation to prevent potential misuse or multiple interpretations.
HC held that statutory limitation for passing a Final Assessment Order under Section 144C cannot be dependent on user functionalities or internal processes. The limitation period commences from the earliest instance when DRP directions are visible to the assessing officer through the 360-degree view portal. The fact that no separate email was sent to the Assessing Officer does not impact the timeline, as the system provides real-time access to uploaded documents. Referencing precedents from Vodafone Idea Limited and Louis Dreyfus Company India Private Limited, the court decisively ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that limitation provisions must have a strict and unambiguous interpretation to prevent potential misuse or multiple interpretations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.