Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after finding the Assessing Officer's belief was predicated on incorrect factual understanding. Original assessment was already completed under Section 143(3) on 09/03/2001, determining total income at INR 105,85,36,899. Subsequent reassessment proceedings initiated on 25/03/2004 and assessment order dated 30/03/2006 were deemed unsustainable in law, as the foundational premise for reopening the assessment was factually erroneous. The tribunal held that the reassessment notice dated 28/02/2005 and subsequent proceedings did not meet statutory requirements, thereby rendering them invalid and liable to be quashed.
ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after finding the Assessing Officer's belief was predicated on incorrect factual understanding. Original assessment was already completed under Section 143(3) on 09/03/2001, determining total income at INR 105,85,36,899. Subsequent reassessment proceedings initiated on 25/03/2004 and assessment order dated 30/03/2006 were deemed unsustainable in law, as the foundational premise for reopening the assessment was factually erroneous. The tribunal held that the reassessment notice dated 28/02/2005 and subsequent proceedings did not meet statutory requirements, thereby rendering them invalid and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.