Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC applied the principle of Constructive Res Judicata to dismiss the writ petition challenging Clause 3.3 of the Guidelines for Grant of Reward to Informers and Government Servants, 2015. The court held that since the petitioner failed to raise the constitutional challenge in the earlier round of litigation, they are precluded from doing so now. The doctrine aims to prevent multiplicity of litigation and ensure parties present their entire case in a single proceeding. Consequently, the writ petition was deemed not maintainable and summarily dismissed, upholding the principle of finality in legal proceedings.
The HC applied the principle of Constructive Res Judicata to dismiss the writ petition challenging Clause 3.3 of the Guidelines for Grant of Reward to Informers and Government Servants, 2015. The court held that since the petitioner failed to raise the constitutional challenge in the earlier round of litigation, they are precluded from doing so now. The doctrine aims to prevent multiplicity of litigation and ensure parties present their entire case in a single proceeding. Consequently, the writ petition was deemed not maintainable and summarily dismissed, upholding the principle of finality in legal proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.