Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined that penalty imposed on a deceased assessee does not survive after death. The Customs Act lacks specific enabling provisions for assessing and recovering tax/duty from legal representatives of a deceased assessee. Section 142 provides for recovery of government dues, but without explicit statutory mechanism to continue proceedings against legal heirs. The assessments framed in 2002 lacked provisions for enforcement as a first charge. Consequently, the demands raised under the orders dated 24.10.2002 lapse, and the appeals automatically abate due to absence of legal machinery for recovery from deceased assessee's representatives.
HC determined that penalty imposed on a deceased assessee does not survive after death. The Customs Act lacks specific enabling provisions for assessing and recovering tax/duty from legal representatives of a deceased assessee. Section 142 provides for recovery of government dues, but without explicit statutory mechanism to continue proceedings against legal heirs. The assessments framed in 2002 lacked provisions for enforcement as a first charge. Consequently, the demands raised under the orders dated 24.10.2002 lapse, and the appeals automatically abate due to absence of legal machinery for recovery from deceased assessee's representatives.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.