Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that in cases of company liquidation, Sections 46(2), 49(1)(iii)(c), and 55(2)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are applicable for computing capital gains. The unique circumstance involved two transactions within the same financial year: share transfer resulting in asset distribution and subsequent asset sale. The court found the Tribunal's procedural approach incorrect, particularly in not referring the matter to a larger bench. The computation methodology for cost of acquisition was determined by analyzing both transactions comprehensively. Ultimately, the decision was rendered against the revenue, favoring the assessee's interpretation of the statutory provisions.
HC held that in cases of company liquidation, Sections 46(2), 49(1)(iii)(c), and 55(2)(b)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are applicable for computing capital gains. The unique circumstance involved two transactions within the same financial year: share transfer resulting in asset distribution and subsequent asset sale. The court found the Tribunal's procedural approach incorrect, particularly in not referring the matter to a larger bench. The computation methodology for cost of acquisition was determined by analyzing both transactions comprehensively. Ultimately, the decision was rendered against the revenue, favoring the assessee's interpretation of the statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
