Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled on Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim where Form No. 67 was filed beyond statutory deadline. The tribunal held that delayed filing does not automatically disqualify FTC claim. Applying judicial precedents from Madras HC and ITAT Kolkata, the tribunal determined that procedural delays in submitting Form No. 67 under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules do not preclude taxpayer from claiming foreign tax credit. The appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant FTC benefit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdiction consistent with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA. Assessee's appeal was consequently allowed, establishing that technical non-compliance does not nullify substantive tax credit entitlement.
ITAT ruled on Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim where Form No. 67 was filed beyond statutory deadline. The tribunal held that delayed filing does not automatically disqualify FTC claim. Applying judicial precedents from Madras HC and ITAT Kolkata, the tribunal determined that procedural delays in submitting Form No. 67 under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules do not preclude taxpayer from claiming foreign tax credit. The appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant FTC benefit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdiction consistent with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA. Assessee's appeal was consequently allowed, establishing that technical non-compliance does not nullify substantive tax credit entitlement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
