Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim where Form No. 67 was filed beyond statutory deadline. The tribunal held that delayed filing does not automatically disqualify FTC claim. Applying judicial precedents from Madras HC and ITAT Kolkata, the tribunal determined that procedural delays in submitting Form No. 67 under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules do not preclude taxpayer from claiming foreign tax credit. The appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant FTC benefit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdiction consistent with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA. Assessee's appeal was consequently allowed, establishing that technical non-compliance does not nullify substantive tax credit entitlement.
ITAT ruled on Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) claim where Form No. 67 was filed beyond statutory deadline. The tribunal held that delayed filing does not automatically disqualify FTC claim. Applying judicial precedents from Madras HC and ITAT Kolkata, the tribunal determined that procedural delays in submitting Form No. 67 under rule 128(9) of Income-tax Rules do not preclude taxpayer from claiming foreign tax credit. The appellate tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to grant FTC benefit for taxes paid in foreign jurisdiction consistent with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA. Assessee's appeal was consequently allowed, establishing that technical non-compliance does not nullify substantive tax credit entitlement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.