Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT adjudicated multiple issues involving tax assessment for the assessee. Key determinations included: (1) upholding addition under Section 69C for undisclosed project expenditure based on matching accounting figures, (2) disallowing depreciation on gym equipment not installed at business premises, (3) accepting cancellation of property sale agreement and refund of advance, (4) allowing rent expenses for business premises despite procedural oversight, (5) validating foreign travel expenses for legitimate business purpose of marble procurement, and (6) deleting deemed profit additions and advance receipt additions due to lack of substantive evidence. Overall, most grounds were decided either partially or fully in favor of the assessee, with the tribunal emphasizing substantive compliance over procedural technicalities.
The ITAT adjudicated multiple issues involving tax assessment for the assessee. Key determinations included: (1) upholding addition under Section 69C for undisclosed project expenditure based on matching accounting figures, (2) disallowing depreciation on gym equipment not installed at business premises, (3) accepting cancellation of property sale agreement and refund of advance, (4) allowing rent expenses for business premises despite procedural oversight, (5) validating foreign travel expenses for legitimate business purpose of marble procurement, and (6) deleting deemed profit additions and advance receipt additions due to lack of substantive evidence. Overall, most grounds were decided either partially or fully in favor of the assessee, with the tribunal emphasizing substantive compliance over procedural technicalities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.