Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT determined CPC exceeded jurisdictional authority in disallowing Section 80P deduction for cooperative society. Despite belated ITR filing, the tribunal found no legal basis for CPC to deny deduction under Section 80P(2). The impugned order was vacated, directing CPC to reverse disallowance and accept the claimed deduction under Chapter VI-A. The tribunal explicitly held that CPC lacked explicit statutory power to reject the deduction at the intimation stage under Section 143(1), thereby restoring the appellant's tax benefit.
ITAT determined CPC exceeded jurisdictional authority in disallowing Section 80P deduction for cooperative society. Despite belated ITR filing, the tribunal found no legal basis for CPC to deny deduction under Section 80P(2). The impugned order was vacated, directing CPC to reverse disallowance and accept the claimed deduction under Chapter VI-A. The tribunal explicitly held that CPC lacked explicit statutory power to reject the deduction at the intimation stage under Section 143(1), thereby restoring the appellant's tax benefit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.