Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC held that a Commissioner's mere decision to appeal does not automatically suspend a refund order under Section 54(11). The plain statutory language indicates that the pendency of an appeal does not ipso facto place the principal order in abeyance. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court mandated that the revenue authority must comply with the appellate order and release the refund amount with applicable statutory interest. The writ petition was consequently allowed, directing immediate refund to the petitioner.
HC held that a Commissioner's mere decision to appeal does not automatically suspend a refund order under Section 54(11). The plain statutory language indicates that the pendency of an appeal does not ipso facto place the principal order in abeyance. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the court mandated that the revenue authority must comply with the appellate order and release the refund amount with applicable statutory interest. The writ petition was consequently allowed, directing immediate refund to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.