Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding significant legal defects in the assessment order. Despite clear intimation of company amalgamation and submission of NCLT order, the AO issued notice u/s 143(2) against a non-existent entity. The TPO and AO both ignored repeated communications about the merger, rendering the assessment order legally invalid. The tribunal held that passing a final assessment order against a non-existent corporate entity constitutes a fundamental procedural error, thereby rendering the entire proceedings null and void. The assessment order was consequently set aside due to substantial legal infirmity in the administrative process.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding significant legal defects in the assessment order. Despite clear intimation of company amalgamation and submission of NCLT order, the AO issued notice u/s 143(2) against a non-existent entity. The TPO and AO both ignored repeated communications about the merger, rendering the assessment order legally invalid. The tribunal held that passing a final assessment order against a non-existent corporate entity constitutes a fundamental procedural error, thereby rendering the entire proceedings null and void. The assessment order was consequently set aside due to substantial legal infirmity in the administrative process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.