Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT adjudicated a tax collection at source (TCS) penalty case involving coal and lignite sales. The tribunal found reasonable cause under Section 273B for delayed TCS compliance, noting the taxpayer had ultimately deposited Rs. 87,750/- in the same financial year and the delay resulted from personnel illness. Despite initial non-compliance, the taxpayer submitted challans evidencing payment. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty levy, thereby accepting the taxpayer's contention of reasonable cause and procedural irregularity. The penalty under Section 271CA was consequently quashed.
ITAT adjudicated a tax collection at source (TCS) penalty case involving coal and lignite sales. The tribunal found reasonable cause under Section 273B for delayed TCS compliance, noting the taxpayer had ultimately deposited Rs. 87,750/- in the same financial year and the delay resulted from personnel illness. Despite initial non-compliance, the taxpayer submitted challans evidencing payment. The tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty levy, thereby accepting the taxpayer's contention of reasonable cause and procedural irregularity. The penalty under Section 271CA was consequently quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
