Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax proceedings related to GST evasion and bogus invoices. The court found the petitioners were not diligent, having delayed their response to the show cause notice for six months and only raising objections when personal hearing was imminent. The HC held this was not a fit case for extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226, directing petitioners to pursue appellate remedies. The court granted a 30-day window to file an appeal with pre-deposit, ensuring merit-based consideration without limitation bar, while explicitly noting that the order's observations would not prejudice the appellate proceedings.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging tax proceedings related to GST evasion and bogus invoices. The court found the petitioners were not diligent, having delayed their response to the show cause notice for six months and only raising objections when personal hearing was imminent. The HC held this was not a fit case for extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226, directing petitioners to pursue appellate remedies. The court granted a 30-day window to file an appeal with pre-deposit, ensuring merit-based consideration without limitation bar, while explicitly noting that the order's observations would not prejudice the appellate proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
