Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC rejected the applicant's claim for compound interest under s.244A(1)(b) r.w.s.132B(4)(b), which explicitly provides only for simple interest. The Court clarified that its prior order did not mandate cumulative or compound interest calculation. No statutory provision was identified supporting the interpretation of "cumulative interest" as compound interest. Consequently, the opposite parties cannot be held liable for willful disobedience, as no definitive legal framework exists for computing cumulative interest beyond simple interest prescribed by the statutory provision.
HC rejected the applicant's claim for compound interest under s.244A(1)(b) r.w.s.132B(4)(b), which explicitly provides only for simple interest. The Court clarified that its prior order did not mandate cumulative or compound interest calculation. No statutory provision was identified supporting the interpretation of "cumulative interest" as compound interest. Consequently, the opposite parties cannot be held liable for willful disobedience, as no definitive legal framework exists for computing cumulative interest beyond simple interest prescribed by the statutory provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
