Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC rejected the applicant's claim for compound interest under s.244A(1)(b) r.w.s.132B(4)(b), which explicitly provides only for simple interest. The Court clarified that its prior order did not mandate cumulative or compound interest calculation. No statutory provision was identified supporting the interpretation of "cumulative interest" as compound interest. Consequently, the opposite parties cannot be held liable for willful disobedience, as no definitive legal framework exists for computing cumulative interest beyond simple interest prescribed by the statutory provision.
HC rejected the applicant's claim for compound interest under s.244A(1)(b) r.w.s.132B(4)(b), which explicitly provides only for simple interest. The Court clarified that its prior order did not mandate cumulative or compound interest calculation. No statutory provision was identified supporting the interpretation of "cumulative interest" as compound interest. Consequently, the opposite parties cannot be held liable for willful disobedience, as no definitive legal framework exists for computing cumulative interest beyond simple interest prescribed by the statutory provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
