Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.