Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.