Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
The ITAT addressed the denial of tax regime option under section 115BAC. The tribunal held that the assessee's option to pay taxes under the new regime was valid, despite not filing Form No. 10-IE within the prescribed time. The court determined that since the assessee had previously opted for the new regime and filed the form in the preceding year, a fresh form was not required. The tribunal found the CPC's denial of the tax option was not in accordance with law and decided in favor of the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal condoned the 71-day delay in filing the appeal, considering the counsel's preoccupation as a sufficient reason.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.