Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC adjudicated directors' liability in a liquidated company under CGST Act, holding that Section 88(3) permits recovery of tax, penalty, and interest only when determined under CGST Act. Section 174(2)(e) preserves recovery mechanisms under prior Act, 1944, mandating separate legal proceedings. The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside impugned notices while permitting respondents to pursue alternative recovery remedies consistent with the Act, 1944's legal framework, thus restricting directors' liability to CGST Act-assessed dues and maintaining distinct procedural pathways for tax recovery.
HC adjudicated directors' liability in a liquidated company under CGST Act, holding that Section 88(3) permits recovery of tax, penalty, and interest only when determined under CGST Act. Section 174(2)(e) preserves recovery mechanisms under prior Act, 1944, mandating separate legal proceedings. The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside impugned notices while permitting respondents to pursue alternative recovery remedies consistent with the Act, 1944's legal framework, thus restricting directors' liability to CGST Act-assessed dues and maintaining distinct procedural pathways for tax recovery.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
