Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
HC finds SCN under Finance Act, 1994 and CGST Act, 2017 procedurally defective. The 2nd respondent failed to provide adequate hearing and did not properly consider the petitioner's submissions, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order dated 21.03.2022 was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, ensuring the petitioner receives fair opportunity to present arguments. The court's intervention rectifies procedural irregularities without adjudicating the substantive merits of the original dispute, thereby upholding fundamental principles of administrative justice.
HC finds SCN under Finance Act, 1994 and CGST Act, 2017 procedurally defective. The 2nd respondent failed to provide adequate hearing and did not properly consider the petitioner's submissions, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the impugned order dated 21.03.2022 was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration, ensuring the petitioner receives fair opportunity to present arguments. The court's intervention rectifies procedural irregularities without adjudicating the substantive merits of the original dispute, thereby upholding fundamental principles of administrative justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
