Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
SC dismissed the SLP due to a 295-day delay in filing, which remained unexplained by the petitioners. The underlying tax matter concerned an assessment order under Section 144C, where the FAO's order was deemed time-barred two years after DRP directions. The HC previously ruled that the original return of income must be accepted, entitling the petitioner to a refund with applicable interest. The procedural requirement mandated completion within 30 days of the order's upload. The SLP was consequently rejected on procedural grounds of delay, without examining the substantive tax dispute.
SC dismissed the SLP due to a 295-day delay in filing, which remained unexplained by the petitioners. The underlying tax matter concerned an assessment order under Section 144C, where the FAO's order was deemed time-barred two years after DRP directions. The HC previously ruled that the original return of income must be accepted, entitling the petitioner to a refund with applicable interest. The procedural requirement mandated completion within 30 days of the order's upload. The SLP was consequently rejected on procedural grounds of delay, without examining the substantive tax dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
