Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining tax liability for services provided to Indian customers under India-USA DTAA. The tribunal held that income from domain name registration services is not taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi) or Article 12(3). Additionally, non-domain services like web hosting and web designing do not constitute technical knowledge transfer and thus fall outside the scope of Fees for Independent Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b). The assessee qualifies as a resident under Article 4 of the treaty and is entitled to avail DTAA benefits, with the fundamental power to tax distinguished from actual tax payment.
ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, determining tax liability for services provided to Indian customers under India-USA DTAA. The tribunal held that income from domain name registration services is not taxable in India under section 9(1)(vi) or Article 12(3). Additionally, non-domain services like web hosting and web designing do not constitute technical knowledge transfer and thus fall outside the scope of Fees for Independent Services (FIS) under Article 12(4)(b). The assessee qualifies as a resident under Article 4 of the treaty and is entitled to avail DTAA benefits, with the fundamental power to tax distinguished from actual tax payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
