Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
ITAT allowed the trust's appeal, rejecting CIT(E)'s cancellation of registration u/s 12A and 12AB. The tribunal found no justification for cancellation, noting the trust was established in 1930, previously granted registration in 1975, and consistently assessed under section 143(3). The tribunal emphasized rule of consistency, highlighting that no material changes in trust's activities were demonstrated. Key grounds for rejecting cancellation included: trust's longstanding tax compliance, permissible charitable donations to other trusts, legitimate rental income, and absence of specific year-wise violations. The decision upholds the trust's registration, rejecting revenue's arguments about community-specific establishment and alleged procedural non-compliance.
ITAT allowed the trust's appeal, rejecting CIT(E)'s cancellation of registration u/s 12A and 12AB. The tribunal found no justification for cancellation, noting the trust was established in 1930, previously granted registration in 1975, and consistently assessed under section 143(3). The tribunal emphasized rule of consistency, highlighting that no material changes in trust's activities were demonstrated. Key grounds for rejecting cancellation included: trust's longstanding tax compliance, permissible charitable donations to other trusts, legitimate rental income, and absence of specific year-wise violations. The decision upholds the trust's registration, rejecting revenue's arguments about community-specific establishment and alleged procedural non-compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
