Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on long-term capital gains (LTCG) taxation for shares acquired before 01.04.2017 under India-Singapore DTAA. The tribunal held that LTCG from share transfer cannot be taxed in India for pre-specified shares. The assessee can choose treaty benefits for each transaction separately and is entitled to carry forward long-term capital loss (LTCL) under domestic tax provisions. The appellate authority found merit in the assessee's argument regarding carry forward of LTCL, noting the issue was debatable and the Assessing Officer incorrectly disallowed LTCL carry forward. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, permitting LTCL carry forward and treaty benefits application.
ITAT ruled on long-term capital gains (LTCG) taxation for shares acquired before 01.04.2017 under India-Singapore DTAA. The tribunal held that LTCG from share transfer cannot be taxed in India for pre-specified shares. The assessee can choose treaty benefits for each transaction separately and is entitled to carry forward long-term capital loss (LTCL) under domestic tax provisions. The appellate authority found merit in the assessee's argument regarding carry forward of LTCL, noting the issue was debatable and the Assessing Officer incorrectly disallowed LTCL carry forward. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, permitting LTCL carry forward and treaty benefits application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.