Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
