Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
