Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving long-term capital gains (LTCG) and cost of acquisition determination. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to adopt fair market value based on an open auction transaction in a nearby village, rejecting previous valuation methods. Regarding section 54B deduction, the tribunal partially allowed the assessee's claim, permitting deduction for agricultural land purchased in the assessee's name and disallowing deduction for land purchased in the spouse's name. The decision emphasized consistent valuation principles and legal interpretation of land acquisition and tax deduction provisions, ultimately providing a nuanced resolution to the tax assessment challenges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
