Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the enhancement of imported goods' transaction value. The Tribunal held that unilateral value enhancement based solely on selective National Import Database (NIDB) data without adhering to statutory provisions is legally unsustainable. Relying on precedent in a prior case involving similar circumstances, the Tribunal found no valid grounds to modify the original declared transaction value, thereby upholding the importer's valuation and rejecting the Revenue's appeal without merit.
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the enhancement of imported goods' transaction value. The Tribunal held that unilateral value enhancement based solely on selective National Import Database (NIDB) data without adhering to statutory provisions is legally unsustainable. Relying on precedent in a prior case involving similar circumstances, the Tribunal found no valid grounds to modify the original declared transaction value, thereby upholding the importer's valuation and rejecting the Revenue's appeal without merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.