Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the refund rejection order for export goods. The court found that the Joint Commissioner of State Tax exercised quasi-judicial functions improperly by considering extraneous materials while rejecting the refund. The original order dated 05.12.2023 was treated as a show-cause notice, directing the petitioner to submit explanatory documents within eight weeks. The Joint Commissioner was mandated to pass a detailed speaking order addressing the petitioner's contentions and adhering to Supreme Court principles of natural justice. The appellate authority's order was set aside, and the refund rejection order was converted into a fresh show-cause notice for reconsideration.
The HC partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition challenging the refund rejection order for export goods. The court found that the Joint Commissioner of State Tax exercised quasi-judicial functions improperly by considering extraneous materials while rejecting the refund. The original order dated 05.12.2023 was treated as a show-cause notice, directing the petitioner to submit explanatory documents within eight weeks. The Joint Commissioner was mandated to pass a detailed speaking order addressing the petitioner's contentions and adhering to Supreme Court principles of natural justice. The appellate authority's order was set aside, and the refund rejection order was converted into a fresh show-cause notice for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
