Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
HC allows petitioner's challenge to DTVSV Scheme declaration rejection. The court found the non-disclosure of pending writ petition was immaterial and directed the Designated Authority to process the declaration. The authority must determine the payable amount in accordance with DTVSV Scheme provisions, using the original declaration date of 23.12.2024. The court emphasized that the petitioner's waiver of rights and commitment to withdraw the writ petition upon certificate issuance were valid. The ruling effectively mandates the administrative authority to proceed with the declaration processing without technical objections.
HC allows petitioner's challenge to DTVSV Scheme declaration rejection. The court found the non-disclosure of pending writ petition was immaterial and directed the Designated Authority to process the declaration. The authority must determine the payable amount in accordance with DTVSV Scheme provisions, using the original declaration date of 23.12.2024. The court emphasized that the petitioner's waiver of rights and commitment to withdraw the writ petition upon certificate issuance were valid. The ruling effectively mandates the administrative authority to proceed with the declaration processing without technical objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.