Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
AT adjudicated a money laundering case involving failure to file Cash Transaction Reports (CTRs) for interconnected transactions exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs monthly. The tribunal reduced penalties from initial assessments, imposing a consolidated penalty of Rs. 50,000 for non-reporting of 9 CTRs and an additional Rs. 10,000 for ineffective internal transaction monitoring mechanisms. The ruling affirmed contravention of PMLA Section 12(1)(b) and PML Rules, while adopting a relatively lenient approach by substantially mitigating the original penalty quantum. Appeal was disposed of with directed monetary penalties against the appellant bank.
AT adjudicated a money laundering case involving failure to file Cash Transaction Reports (CTRs) for interconnected transactions exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs monthly. The tribunal reduced penalties from initial assessments, imposing a consolidated penalty of Rs. 50,000 for non-reporting of 9 CTRs and an additional Rs. 10,000 for ineffective internal transaction monitoring mechanisms. The ruling affirmed contravention of PMLA Section 12(1)(b) and PML Rules, while adopting a relatively lenient approach by substantially mitigating the original penalty quantum. Appeal was disposed of with directed monetary penalties against the appellant bank.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.