Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
SC upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i), and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, rejecting claims of manifest arbitrariness and violation of Article 14. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging pecuniary jurisdictions of consumer commissions based on value of goods and services. The judgment emphasizes legislative competence in prescribing tribunal jurisdictions and underscores the importance of institutional effectiveness, directing the Central Consumer Protection Council and Authority to conduct surveys and review mechanisms for efficient consumer grievance redressal.
SC upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i), and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, rejecting claims of manifest arbitrariness and violation of Article 14. The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging pecuniary jurisdictions of consumer commissions based on value of goods and services. The judgment emphasizes legislative competence in prescribing tribunal jurisdictions and underscores the importance of institutional effectiveness, directing the Central Consumer Protection Council and Authority to conduct surveys and review mechanisms for efficient consumer grievance redressal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
