Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC allows writ petition challenging GST recovery order due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found that mandatory personal hearing under Section 75(4) was not conducted, rendering the impugned order invalid. While the limitation period argument was rejected, the procedural defect of non-compliance with hearing requirements became the decisive factor. The recovery order was consequently set aside, emphasizing the critical importance of providing opportunity of hearing in administrative proceedings involving tax recovery.
HC allows writ petition challenging GST recovery order due to violation of natural justice principles. The court found that mandatory personal hearing under Section 75(4) was not conducted, rendering the impugned order invalid. While the limitation period argument was rejected, the procedural defect of non-compliance with hearing requirements became the decisive factor. The recovery order was consequently set aside, emphasizing the critical importance of providing opportunity of hearing in administrative proceedings involving tax recovery.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
