Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC held that Sections 269-UN and 293 of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not bar civil court jurisdiction in the present suit. The court found no impediment to plaintiffs seeking declaration of property re-vestment, as the suit does not challenge or modify any income tax order. The single judge's earlier order was set aside, with the suit restored for expedited hearing. The court ruled against revenue authorities, determining that the statutory provisions do not prevent judicial review of the specific legal claim. No costs were awarded, and the original proceedings shall continue until final disposal.
HC held that Sections 269-UN and 293 of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not bar civil court jurisdiction in the present suit. The court found no impediment to plaintiffs seeking declaration of property re-vestment, as the suit does not challenge or modify any income tax order. The single judge's earlier order was set aside, with the suit restored for expedited hearing. The court ruled against revenue authorities, determining that the statutory provisions do not prevent judicial review of the specific legal claim. No costs were awarded, and the original proceedings shall continue until final disposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
