Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4141 to 4160 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the assessment reopening under SS147 was procedurally flawed. The AO failed to substantiate allegations of income escape by thoroughly examining disputed shipping bill evidence. The Assessee's contention of manual bill correction and non-involvement in alleged exports was not adequately addressed. Consequently, the SS148A(d) order was set aside, effectively nullifying the assessment reopening and upholding the Assessee's appeal without prejudice to potential future reassessment if concrete evidence emerges.
HC held that the assessment reopening under SS147 was procedurally flawed. The AO failed to substantiate allegations of income escape by thoroughly examining disputed shipping bill evidence. The Assessee's contention of manual bill correction and non-involvement in alleged exports was not adequately addressed. Consequently, the SS148A(d) order was set aside, effectively nullifying the assessment reopening and upholding the Assessee's appeal without prejudice to potential future reassessment if concrete evidence emerges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
