Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the assessment reopening under SS147 was procedurally flawed. The AO failed to substantiate allegations of income escape by thoroughly examining disputed shipping bill evidence. The Assessee's contention of manual bill correction and non-involvement in alleged exports was not adequately addressed. Consequently, the SS148A(d) order was set aside, effectively nullifying the assessment reopening and upholding the Assessee's appeal without prejudice to potential future reassessment if concrete evidence emerges.
HC held that the assessment reopening under SS147 was procedurally flawed. The AO failed to substantiate allegations of income escape by thoroughly examining disputed shipping bill evidence. The Assessee's contention of manual bill correction and non-involvement in alleged exports was not adequately addressed. Consequently, the SS148A(d) order was set aside, effectively nullifying the assessment reopening and upholding the Assessee's appeal without prejudice to potential future reassessment if concrete evidence emerges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.