Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
ITAT resolved a dispute regarding donation deduction under section 80G. The tribunal determined that the assessee's donation was in cash, not in kind, based on evidence of direct equipment order, installation at donee premises, and financial support. The assessee's role was purely financial, without direct involvement in purchase or installation. Following precedent from a coordinate bench and rejecting revenue's contention, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the donation eligible for deduction. Consequently, the penalty levy became academic and was disposed of, effectively vindicating the assessee's claim for tax deduction.
ITAT resolved a dispute regarding donation deduction under section 80G. The tribunal determined that the assessee's donation was in cash, not in kind, based on evidence of direct equipment order, installation at donee premises, and financial support. The assessee's role was purely financial, without direct involvement in purchase or installation. Following precedent from a coordinate bench and rejecting revenue's contention, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the donation eligible for deduction. Consequently, the penalty levy became academic and was disposed of, effectively vindicating the assessee's claim for tax deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
