Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's claim for deduction of expenditure incurred in an abandoned project, recognizing that the project abandonment was due to reasons beyond the assessee's control. The tribunal held that the written-off expenses under 'work in progress' were commercially justified and not subject to tax authority scrutiny. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance in both the section 143(1) intimation and section 143(3) assessment order, effectively permitting the expenditure deduction based on the commercial reasonableness of the assessee's decision.
ITAT allowed the taxpayer's claim for deduction of expenditure incurred in an abandoned project, recognizing that the project abandonment was due to reasons beyond the assessee's control. The tribunal held that the written-off expenses under 'work in progress' were commercially justified and not subject to tax authority scrutiny. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance in both the section 143(1) intimation and section 143(3) assessment order, effectively permitting the expenditure deduction based on the commercial reasonableness of the assessee's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.