Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
ITAT held that the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 were valid and the assessee cannot challenge the order since it had attained finality. In the substantive matter concerning unexplained cash credit u/s 68 for share capital and share premium from 18 private limited applicants, the tribunal found that the assessee successfully established the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of share applicants through their tax assessments, financial statements, and ROC scrutiny. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the addition u/s 68, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and allowed the assessee's grounds 1-5, concluding no addition was warranted based on the comprehensive documentation and verification of investment sources.
ITAT held that the revisionary proceedings u/s 263 were valid and the assessee cannot challenge the order since it had attained finality. In the substantive matter concerning unexplained cash credit u/s 68 for share capital and share premium from 18 private limited applicants, the tribunal found that the assessee successfully established the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of share applicants through their tax assessments, financial statements, and ROC scrutiny. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the addition u/s 68, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and allowed the assessee's grounds 1-5, concluding no addition was warranted based on the comprehensive documentation and verification of investment sources.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
