Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC dismissed petitioner's appeal as time-barred under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. The appeal was filed on 29.09.2023, approximately one year and three months beyond the prescribed limitation period. The court held that the appellate authority lacks power to entertain appeals beyond the statutory 30-day extension period. The petitioner's failure to file regular returns and late appeal submission precluded any relief. The court found no perversity in the original registration cancellation order and upheld the appellate authority's decision, thereby conclusively rejecting the petitioner's challenge to the GST registration cancellation.
HC dismissed petitioner's appeal as time-barred under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. The appeal was filed on 29.09.2023, approximately one year and three months beyond the prescribed limitation period. The court held that the appellate authority lacks power to entertain appeals beyond the statutory 30-day extension period. The petitioner's failure to file regular returns and late appeal submission precluded any relief. The court found no perversity in the original registration cancellation order and upheld the appellate authority's decision, thereby conclusively rejecting the petitioner's challenge to the GST registration cancellation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
