Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT addressed a procedural issue regarding the continuation of a Special Bench hearing despite a similar case pending before the High Court. The Tribunal determined that the Special Bench can proceed with hearing the matter, noting no legal prohibition exists preventing its continuation. The key considerations included: statutory powers under Sections 253 and 255(3), absence of mandatory requirement to stay proceedings, the advanced age of the case (assessment year 1998-99), and the potential for procedural complications if the reference were withdrawn. The Tribunal ultimately ruled that the Special Bench may continue hearing and decide the appeal in accordance with law, rejecting the proposal to withdraw the reference or dissolve the Special Bench.
ITAT addressed a procedural issue regarding the continuation of a Special Bench hearing despite a similar case pending before the High Court. The Tribunal determined that the Special Bench can proceed with hearing the matter, noting no legal prohibition exists preventing its continuation. The key considerations included: statutory powers under Sections 253 and 255(3), absence of mandatory requirement to stay proceedings, the advanced age of the case (assessment year 1998-99), and the potential for procedural complications if the reference were withdrawn. The Tribunal ultimately ruled that the Special Bench may continue hearing and decide the appeal in accordance with law, rejecting the proposal to withdraw the reference or dissolve the Special Bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.