Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC allowed the petition challenging goods seizure during transit. The court found no legal basis for seizure under GST Act, as authorities failed to establish tax evasion intent or document discrepancies. The goods were being transported from Meerut to Kanpur, intercepted at Basti solely due to an alternate route, without any substantive evidence of procedural violations. The court emphasized that absent specific statutory provisions mandating route declaration, the seizure was unwarranted. All accompanying documents were verified as genuine in quality and quantity, further invalidating the administrative action. The ruling underscores procedural propriety and protects taxpayer rights against arbitrary administrative interventions.
HC allowed the petition challenging goods seizure during transit. The court found no legal basis for seizure under GST Act, as authorities failed to establish tax evasion intent or document discrepancies. The goods were being transported from Meerut to Kanpur, intercepted at Basti solely due to an alternate route, without any substantive evidence of procedural violations. The court emphasized that absent specific statutory provisions mandating route declaration, the seizure was unwarranted. All accompanying documents were verified as genuine in quality and quantity, further invalidating the administrative action. The ruling underscores procedural propriety and protects taxpayer rights against arbitrary administrative interventions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
